Technology often is the problem, or more concretely we can use technology to make the solution cheaper, which makes it more plausible for politicians to impleme

Technology often is the problem, or more concretely we can use technology to make the solution cheaper, which makes it more plausible for politicians to implement. Politicians already use x amount of money trying to prevent climate change. If technology was advanced enough that x is enough to prevent climate change completely, we could then solve the problem with a technological solution (assuming politicians are willing). I don't think the tech is nearly cheap enough yet.