> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/16/insider/china-xinjiang-reporting-surveillance-uighur.html https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/16/insider/china-xinjiang-re...

> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/16/insider/china-xinjiang-reporting-surveillance-uighur.html https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/16/insider/china-xinjiang-re... The NYT reports are texts, without even a photo of any one of the Chinese observers. While at the same time, the report was working together with some colleague... It's rather dubious that such photos were not included at all... The reporting is also all about being followed, and has no information about what they actually learned. It's like: see that person follows me, they must not like me asking people around, so I wont ask around, I'll just report that I got followed. WTH? Are you are reporter or some kind of superhero? To report any kind of coverup story, you have to be covert and careful... This whole piece just looks to play on the customized lazy bureaucratic and use imagination to confer certain biased sterotype... > https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/06/22/technology/xinjiang-uyghurs-china-propaganda.html https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/06/22/technology/xi... I cannot access, paywalled.