3 ms·
I guess it might technically legally be fraud but OTOH I wouldn't call it "wrong" because if you maintained CA domicile you'd keep paying CA income tax on your
by collectedparts 5y ago
I guess it might technically legally be fraud but OTOH I wouldn't call it "wrong" because if you maintained CA domicile you'd keep paying CA income tax on your income.
And with TX not having income tax, it's almost like your CA income tax pays into the benefit pool...
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- gamblor956 5y agoIf you maintain your CA domicile and continue to pay CA income taxes, then in that example, your physical and legal residence would remain in CA, so you're not a TX resident, you're a CA resident temporarily in TX. (Yes, residency is very complicated for state purposes, as each state has its own definition and thresholds.) Also, unemployment is funded by employers, not income taxes, using an insurance-style scheme.