4 ms·
Oh man, I have a rabbit hole for you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhizome_(philosophy) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhizome_(philosophy)
by prionassembly 5y ago
Oh man, I have a rabbit hole for you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhizome_(philosophy) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhizome_(philosophy)
- steveklabnik 5y agoHere's a near-decade old talk from me on this exact topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfKAScYkGlk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfKAScYkGlk I haven't watched this in like... a long time, so maybe I'd think it's bad now.
- prionassembly 5y agoI recommend Manuel de Landa (stylizes his name to Delanda these days), particularly “Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy” if your flavor is Anglo style analytical philosophy. The relevant Deleuze texts (A Thousand Plateaus) can be infuriating if you’re not open to this whole other style of thinking, but Deleuze is no postmodern, he’s a realist and a materialist and sort of a science worshipper, albeit from an angle that would make Neil deGrasse Tyson start bleeding from his nose until he passed out, if he ever grokked it. Start with Delanda, probably. [googling a little, this isn’t great but isn’t bad for something readily accessible: http://dar.aucegypt.edu/bitstream/handle/10526/3534/DeLanda%27s%20ontology.pdf?sequence=1 http://dar.aucegypt.edu/bitstream/handle/10526/3534/DeLanda%... ]
- steveklabnik 5y agoHeck yeah, in full agreement with all of that.