Here’s an example of reality that violates your set of assumptions. Wikileaks on Palin in 2008. How does your complaint comport with this reality? It doesn’t.

Here’s an example of reality that violates your set of assumptions. Wikileaks on Palin in 2008. How does your complaint comport with this reality? It doesn’t. https://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Sarah_Palin_Yahoo_account_2008 https://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Sarah_Palin_Yahoo_account_200... The statement from Wikileaks is inarguable given the information available. You have simply extrapolated a talking point that they discriminated against one side. That is simply second-order, non-provable agitation.