3 ms·
> Well, since you ask, I downvoted you for restating the false equivalence between OOP and inheritance, for the abjectly incorrect statement that no-one agrees
by throwaway894345 5y ago
> Well, since you ask, I downvoted you for restating the false equivalence between OOP and inheritance, for the abjectly incorrect statement that no-one agrees what OOP is, for the frankly absurd and wilfully ignorant claim that no-one articulates practical examples for the circumstances when inheritance rather than composition might actually be worth considering, and for bitching about downvotes, particularly the explicit assumption that they’re coming from people wedded to inheritance, and not from people who dislike disingenuous arguments of any form. Read a fucking book. David West’s Object Thinking, for example.
Thank you for clarifying that your downvote was definitely not an emotional overreaction. :)
- inopinatus 5y ago> Thank you for clarifying that your downvote was definitely not an emotional overreaction. :) Smileys don’t turn snide into humour, so now you can add “naked ad hominem” to the litany of downvote attractors.
- throwaway894345 5y agoI thought it was the italics. In which ever case, this conversation has definitely been fruitful and enlightening. Thank you for your contributions. . . . . . :)
- inopinatus 5y agoThis line of vacuousness merely continues to highlight how brittle and indefensible the original arguments were.