You are basically correct although it seems to hinge on the definition of an authorized use(r) and also they only vacated the appeals court decision so Microsof

You are basically correct although it seems to hinge on the definition of an authorized use(r) and also they only vacated the appeals court decision so Microsoft will continue with the same case now in the lower court. There is a good discussion of the more nuanced situation here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27510103 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27510103