4 ms·
Your comment starts presenting an interesting debate but you steer towards some kind of partisanism or tribalism that is quite stange to witness. You do not ne
by ainiriand 5y ago
Your comment starts presenting an interesting debate but you steer towards some kind of partisanism or tribalism that is quite stange to witness.
You do not need to hear any kind of moral guardian to do and conduct yourself knowing that every single person is responsible of the actions they make and though I am not responsible for those starving children I am responsible for many of the atrocities commited for the burgers I ate.
It is not about virtue, it is taking responsibility of your own actions and checking your own ethic to decide if it is correct or not.
- Noos 5y agoIt's not partisan in the sense of right or left, the "starving kids in china" was pretty much the same thing on the right. Jellyby was definitely a moral conservative, and victorianism is surprisingly bi-partian. Usually its the fashions of the rich, if anything. HN in particular is unaware of how they imitate it, with the sudden rediscovery of Stoicism and Aurelius a bit much. I don't agree that easting meat is an atrocity. I think it devalues words to use them like that. I think a lot of veganism is the same reaction to the existence of suffering a lot of religions have had or deal with; it's a form of going to the desert as a monk or mystic to escape the contradictions of the world. That is up to everyone, but the difference here is the monks want to make the entire world the desert now.