4 ms·
As a web developer, I really value the extra speed that having my page served from an AMP cache + predictive prefetching gives me. And now that signed exchanges
by nightpool 5y ago
As a web developer, I really value the extra speed that having my page served from an AMP cache + predictive prefetching gives me. And now that signed exchanges have shipped, giving up the top X pixels and the URL bar are no longer required trade-offs to get that value.
- tyingq 5y ago"now that signed exchanges have shipped" For Chrome, yes.
- nightpool 5y agoThat's a good point. Webkit's opposition to Signed Exchanges (ironically, canonically expressed in an HN comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19679621 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19679621) means that I'm stuck with AMP for good performance on iOS for the foreseeable future.
- dmitriid 5y agoNot just WebKit. Mozilla is opposed, too. And they have a whole document on Web Packaging: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ha00dSGKmjoEh2mRiG8FIA5sJ1KihTuZe-AXX1r8P-8/edit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ha00dSGKmjoEh2mRiG8FIA5s...
- nightpool 5y agoSure, I've read Mozilla's standard-position document and I understand their objections, I'm just saying that Webkit's objection is the major blocker to me personally adopting sxg (since Firefox is basically 0% of my mobile traffic)