> "because in the author's mind, AMP is so god dang awful that when given the chance, everyone would immediately want to get rid of it" You must be a mind read

> "because in the author's mind, AMP is so god dang awful that when given the chance, everyone would immediately want to get rid of it" You must be a mind reader, then, because nowhere in the article does the author state or imply that. Indeed, they go out of their way to point out why it's unlikely in the extreme that any publisher will bother, and points out why that's essentially a victory for Google -- indeed this might be the essential point that the author is making in this article.