> Good on Mexico. Preserving the wealth of the middle class and giving access to the poor and unbanked is tye way forward for a more egalitarian society. Genui

> Good on Mexico. Preserving the wealth of the middle class and giving access to the poor and unbanked is tye way forward for a more egalitarian society. Genuine question - how is this going to help the "poor and unbanked" to get access to an economy that's somehow insulated from what you say is the inflation surrounding them? And in what concrete way is it leading to a more "egalitarian society"? As far as I can see, this only gives an opportunity to the already wealthy (and especially the super-wealthy) to increase their wealth at the cost of newcomers to the system. But I'm genuinely curious about the part that I'm missing, where the poorest in society are reaping the benefits of their Bitcoin holdings?