3 ms·
Because it's a hassle, and I really don't care about that. Given that I'd have to go through the hassle of signing my own kernels just to get Windows to boot on
by qalmakka 5y ago
Because it's a hassle, and I really don't care about that. Given that I'd have to go through the hassle of signing my own kernels just to get Windows to boot once a week, I really don't get why I should do that in the first place.
There's no way Windows _NEEDS_ to be signed to boot. Even macOS doesn't complain that much when booted without Secure Boot. Perhaps someone will find a way to cheat Windows about SecureBoot or TPM by using OpenCore, like the Hackintosh community has been doing for a long time.