5 ms·
I don't see how it's despite of that. Original doesn't always mean better.
by TobiasA 5y ago
I don't see how it's despite of that. Original doesn't always mean better.
- cunthorpe 5y agoTo put it in clearer terms, this is like selling a "Chicago-style pizza" but putting cheddar cheese instead of mozzarella. This new version can be successful, but it's still not the original Chicago-style pizza.
- asah 5y agoYou mean that casserole :-) https://youtube.com/watch?v=jCgYMFtxUUw https://youtube.com/watch?v=jCgYMFtxUUw
- nsxwolf 5y agoYou can always tell when someone's never eaten it when they describe it as a casserole or lasagne. There's no way you could eat it and describe it that way. Also, a minority of "Chicago style" pizza is deep dish.
- jessaustin 5y ago[EDIT:] It's amusing that Chicago people are doing this same "we are so misunderstood by the people who pay attention to our marketing" thing seen elsewhere ITT from Europeans. Is it possible for an American city to succeed in this maneuver, or is it a Europe-only thing? All Chicago-style pizzas, fat or thin, are strictly inferior to St Louis-style pizza.
- long_time_gone 5y ago==After all most of the time people like to eat decent pizza.== Considering Pizza Hut is the largest chain in America, I have to disagree. Chicago Tavern-style pizza is the only type I ever see locals eating in Chicago. Deep dish is mostly for tourists. Bon Appetit agrees: Chicago’s Real Signature Pizza Is Crispy, Crunchy, and Nothing Like Deep Dish link: https://www.bonappetit.com/story/real-chicago-pizza-tavern-style https://www.bonappetit.com/story/real-chicago-pizza-tavern-s...
- nsxwolf 5y agoI haven't tried St. Louis style. I'd eat it. It's cut properly, at least.