3 ms·
It's not proof, it's an exception. Also, Sriracha can be litigious: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/05/sriracha-maker-loses-lawsuit-to-its-former-jalapeno-grower
by redis_mlc 5y ago
It's not proof, it's an exception.
Also, Sriracha can be litigious:
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/05/sriracha-maker-loses-lawsuit-to-its-former-jalapeno-grower.html https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/05/sriracha-maker-loses-lawsuit...
- thaumasiotes 5y ago> Also, Sriracha can be litigious Not in the context here - that's not a suit over IP. The basis of the suit is "we overpaid you by $1.4 million, and you refused to return our money". There is nothing strange or even questionable about such a suit, nor is there any reason to view it as an indicator of undesirable practices.
- modeless 5y ago> There is nothing strange or even questionable about such a suit When the final result is an award of $14 million against them plus $10 million in punitive damages, by unanimous jury verdict, it is absolutely questionable and potentially an indicator of undesirable practices.
- contravariant 5y agoGuess this goes to show how much trust the U.S. has in its own legislative system.