3 ms·
>By simply claiming they do. Is that not the criterion you're using for gender? And you still fail to see the difference between gender and sex and how that is
by zaarn 5y ago
>By simply claiming they do. Is that not the criterion you're using for gender?
And you still fail to see the difference between gender and sex and how that is different from culture and skin color. Congratulations.
>Is that sarcasm? Do you know what chromosomes are?
I didn't skip Biology 101.
- alentist 5y agoSo your position is that a person is female simply by virtue of claiming that they "identify as" female. Is a person black simply by virtue of claiming that they "identify as" black? > I didn't skip Biology 101. Looks like you did. Chromosomes carry the genome.
- zaarn 5y agoI am aware Chromosomes carry the genome, but leading the question is not quite fair as well. Since sex and gender were topics, it was well evident that I was talking about Chromosomal differences between humans, NOT gene-level differences. It looks like you skipped out on Biology 101, otherwise the difference would be clear in context and upon my elaboration. Good day.
- alentist 5y ago> I was talking about Chromosomal differences between humans, NOT gene-level differences. Since the former includes the latter, your excuse makes zero sense. It sounds like a convoluted attempt to obfuscate the fact that you thought "chromosomes" was synonymous with "allosomes". > It looks like you skipped out on Biology 101 How so? This is a weird projection. You're the one who clearly didn't know what chromosomes are. Finally, you still haven't answered the question: Is a person black simply by virtue of claiming that they "identify as" black?