>Almost all competitive games nowadays have a powerful client side anticheat which is constantly monitoring processes on a kernel level to combat kernel cheats.

>Almost all competitive games nowadays have a powerful client side anticheat which is constantly monitoring processes on a kernel level to combat kernel cheats. That's totally ok if the anticheat admins are providing a computer to run the software on and not attacking one the player owns. Again "almost everyone else does it" doesn't make it ok, I don't know why people keep repeating that. >absolutely nothing left on the computer That's nice that it doesn't leave a mess, copying tons of data out of the machine from ring0 probably exposes people to a lot of liability though, that whole thing sounds like a terrible idea but it's still better than the status quo so props to you for clearing that bar. >- Everything has malicious potential as soon as you click "Yes" Yes. That's my point. >What if Facebook shares all your personal data randomly? They won't. Well, it's not random, usually you have to pay for it except on some pretty bad days. That's a great example of why I would universally reject something like this though. You pretty much can never trust someone handing you closed blobs. I'm honestly pretty shocked anyone tolerates this, it sounds pretty similar to random cavity searches when you leave wallmart. Maybe because I'm not a "kid" anymore I wouldn't know what the social scene looks like.