4 ms·
They insist on this because doing so makes it harder for people who only want the particular style of cheese and don't care where it's made to find any product
by makomk 5y ago
They insist on this because doing so makes it harder for people who only want the particular style of cheese and don't care where it's made to find any product other than the one that's been given an EU monopoly. For example, for a while Parmesan was a generic name for the style of cheese and Parmigiano-Reggiano was the PDO that people who deeply cared about the origins of their cheese could look for. This wasn't enough for Italian cheese producers, though, so they sued in court to get their PDO extended to Parmesan too. Now the generic version has to be sold as "Italian style hard cheese" and similarly vague, confusing names.
- denton-scratch 5y ago"other than the one that's been given an EU monopoly" A monopoly is when one company has the exclusive right to sell a product. PDO does not confer monopolies. PDO protects the right to use certain labels. The USA doesn't respect PDOs. That's fine, if that's what USAians want. That's their business. I want to know what is in my food, and where it comes from; that's my business. I rely on accurate labelling. This ranting about "EU monopolies" is annoying. It seems to me that it's from people who have never eaten the real thing, can't afford to buy real Roquefort, and resent the europeans for having better food standards than the USA.
- dantheman 5y agoThey resent the fact that Europeans are trying to control what they call food. Europe can easily add PDO Region/Name or whatever labeling, just like a manufacturing label -- but they'd prefer to try and alter the language to protect their industries... Notice how they're not creating new names, they're trying to reign in generic names.