2 ms·
Isn't Vista the arch nemesis of 7? Also 95 is not too great but 98 is definitely not the bad cop, especially SE. Windows ME on the other hand... 2000 is also p
by rzzzt 5y ago
Isn't Vista the arch nemesis of 7? Also 95 is not too great but 98 is definitely not the bad cop, especially SE. Windows ME on the other hand...
2000 is also pretty cool, but didn't show up on the list, and not sure where the NT releases 3 and 4 would go.
- GekkePrutser 5y agoI thought 95 was better than 98 - faster and less bloated. Just the USB support was lacking but OSR2 fixed that mostly. 2000 was definitely better than XP in my book. Of course ME was a complete and total turd. But it was only built in a couple months after MS changed their mind about Windows 2000 personal edition. But really in my book XP was Windows 2000 Bloatware Edition. Same with 98 over 95. With Vista it went the opposite way though, Vista was all glossy/bloaty and Win7 fixed that. And don't start me on Windows 8, that was just a terrible POS on the desktop, with its huge start screen. Nice idea on a tablet, terrible on the desktop.