4 ms·
> If you intend by working 32 hours instead of 40 hours to deliver only 80% value to your org, you would be at a disadvantage. Well you would be delivering 100
by tolbish 5y ago
> If you intend by working 32 hours instead of 40 hours to deliver only 80% value to your org, you would be at a disadvantage.
Well you would be delivering 100% of the possible value you could in 80% of the time. The same as someone who works 6 days a week would have a comparably higher output than their peers working 5 days. Are the employees who work 48 or more hours a week being compared to those who work 40 hours as well?
- kcplate 5y agoYou might be delivering 100% or you might not. You might be more productive at 32 than 40. It’s not necessarily linear. At the end of the day you need to provide a perceived value beyond whatever your rate of comp At 48 hours you have a similar situation, if you are hourly those 8 hours cost the company an extra 50% per hour so you better be providing appropriate value for the overtime rate they are paying you.