The above was meant to be pro nuclear. Though I see how someone could take it either way. Point being, saying one energy source is too expensive Vs another is

The above was meant to be pro nuclear. Though I see how someone could take it either way. Point being, saying one energy source is too expensive Vs another is an idiotic argument should one lead to decarbonization. But sure guys, go ahead and throw trillions on economic bailouts every several years but wring your hands at moderately more expensive energy.