> As others have said, this is either FUD Pointing out the power that MS have is not FUD. If I suggested that there is a chance they would abuse it, that might

> As others have said, this is either FUD Pointing out the power that MS have is not FUD. If I suggested that there is a chance they would abuse it, that might be, but I didn't do that. > or limited to specific systems with broken UEFI implementations. A very quick Google search suggests there are quite a few of those, from mainstream vendors such as Dell and Lenovo. > I, personally, use Arch Linux and the installer isn't signed with anything. True, I oversimplified. The major distros use MS-signed shims, the rest mostly don't.