4 ms·
>> It is really surprising if you go on the road and see something foreign, and it’s coming at you at 15 miles per hour. > If it's going down the bike lane on
by britch 5y ago
>> It is really surprising if you go on the road and see something foreign, and it’s coming at you at 15 miles per hour.
> If it's going down the bike lane on the wrong way then I agree, that's bad and should be corrected.
15 mph is close to top speed on a bike on even ground (for me at least). If I'm causally biking to dinner, I'm not going that fast. The robot could be "coming at you" from behind.
----
Beside the risks of the robots malfunctioning, I think this would be bad for bicyclists if it goes well.
Right now the bots are pretty rare but let's say this is a huge success and a really cheap way to deliver food in a city.
I can imagine there being stretches of bike lanes where the right-lane is a bunch of delivery-bots. That does not leave much room for bikes in the bike lane. "Bike lanes" become "delivery lanes".
Whether or not this is a likely outcome is another discussion but making it a rule that robots can use the bike lane could have bigger consequences than this trial run.
edit: bikes go faster than 15mph
- alanbernstein 5y ago15mph is not close to top speed on a bike.
- britch 5y agoYes, 15mph is not the theoretical max speed of a bike. For me, on my $300 Trek hybrid, traveling on flat land, that's about as fast as it can go. I'm sure someone in good shape on a nice road bike can go faster.
- hytdstd 5y agoFor a cyclist sitting upright (CdA of .5) but with good tires and pavement (Crr of .0035), it takes about 120W to hold 15mph on flat terrain. I would agree that this is about the limit for most casual riders. Serious riders with more power typically don't have a problem riding around other bike lane users. What I'm saying is, I don't think the robots are burdensome for the average bike lane user, as far as speed is concerned.