> There were questions about its editorial oversight, but those were secondary. Basically it's one of those sites, like RT, that has a political position and ha

> There were questions about its editorial oversight, but those were secondary. Basically it's one of those sites, like RT, that has a political position and has little problem with pushing disinformation to support it. I think any news agency is like this. The strength of journalist freedom is that all such different news agencies can present their facts. > disinformation I am pretty sure everyone believed their information and don't want to verify them thoroughly. I mean, even US government does want to verify the so-called evidences of WMD in Iraq...