3 ms·
I'm not really talking about American news media specifically. I don't read the NYT or the WSJ or watch Fox News. These are all anecdotes. I respect your per
by YZF 5y ago
I'm not really talking about American news media specifically. I don't read the NYT or the WSJ or watch Fox News. These are all anecdotes. I respect your perception but the news I consume don't seem to behave the same way. Naturally I have my own biases here.
This seems to be a fairly decent article on the topic:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_coverage_of_the_Arab%E2%80%93Israeli_conflict https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_coverage_of_the_Arab%E2%...
No conclusion.
This is interesting:
https://www.economist.com/lexingtons-notebook/2012/02/03/american-coverage-of-israel https://www.economist.com/lexingtons-notebook/2012/02/03/ame...
"A random check carried out this week showed that there is one citation on Google News for every 50,000 Chinese or Indians, 20,000 Bangladeshis, 8,000 Pakistanis, 5,000 Russians, 3,400 Egyptians (in the midst of horrific soccer riots) or 1200 Syrians (although the regime in Damascus is doing its best to improve its rankings by steadily decreasing the number of living Syrians). But it takes only 300 Israelis for each Google News item on Israel, clear proof that the country is being singled out for disproportionate coverage."
EDIT:
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/11/how-the-media-makes-the-israel-story/383262/ https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/11/ho...
- wolverine876 5y ago> I'm not really talking about American news media specifically. I don't read the NYT or the WSJ or watch Fox News. Well, you keep moving the goalposts. I'm sticking with those goalposts, which are the leading news sources in the most important country by far in regard to Israel. > This seems to be a fairly decent article on the topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/ https://en.wikipedia.org/ ... Seriously? Wikipedia? What basis is there for saying it's decent? But the NYT and WSJ aren't worth your time? > "... it takes only 300 Israelis for each Google News item on Israel, clear proof that the country is being singled out for disproportionate coverage." Singled out implies intent, which there's no evidence of. Are Americans highly interested in Israel and not interested in much of the world? That's not news, nor does it show any bias for or against Israel.