3 ms·
> There's no friction in starting something you love to do. That may be true for you; it's not true for everyone. Nobody in this thread who thinks this app mig
by fastball 5y ago
> There's no friction in starting something you love to do.
That may be true for you; it's not true for everyone. Nobody in this thread who thinks this app might be useful has mentioned people they need speak to "out of duty". I feel like you are projecting how you operate on to everyone else and not actually listening to what they are saying.
I'm sorry you have frequently experienced people that are clearly bored when talking to you. This is not something I have experienced much at all. What I have experienced is friends who lead busy lives and just don't get around to it because they have 10 other things on the docket. When eventually we do get around to talking (usually because of some trigger on either end), the conversations are enjoyable and we are glad to have them. But the idea that someone isn't "important" enough just because you're not consciously thinking about them rather than the many other important responsibilities in your life is one I find silly. We are busy people with a lot of things on our mind. At the same time, some people (clearly) would like a slightly more consistent system that causes them to talk to their friends than a random trigger on social media or what have you.
- brushfoot 5y ago> I'm sorry you have frequently experienced people that are clearly bored when talking to you. There's no need for the ad hominem. Again, the problem with this is not that it's scheduled, it's that it's canned. It's like training a robot to do foreplay. Is it that joyless that I have to let it kickstart the sex before I come into the room? Scheduling a reminder to talk is one thing. But sending a canned opener that I thought of another day and in another mood says that I don't have anything interesting or fun to share with the other person, and if I don't, why should I talk to them? It puts the onus on them.