We don't need oppressive regulations; we simply need courts to adopt a sane definition of "agree". If you're foisting an adhesion contract on more than 1,000 p

We don't need oppressive regulations; we simply need courts to adopt a sane definition of "agree". If you're foisting an adhesion contract on more than 1,000 people, they are not deemed to have "agreed" unless a majority of a random sampling (say, ten) of them actually read and understood the entire document. Otherwise it's void. "Read and understood" is decided by a jury as part of any litigation involving the contract. "Random sampling" is made by court evidentiary procedures. If the contract is negotiated or it was presented to less than 1,000 people the rules stay the way they currently are, since those are the kinds of contracts that English common law was developed for.