3 ms·
No. There isn't. There are lots of people saying they have evidence and referring to other people who say no its true they really have evidence. When you dig it
by rendall 5y ago
No. There isn't. There are lots of people saying they have evidence and referring to other people who say no its true they really have evidence. When you dig it's just circular self-references all the way down.
- adrr 5y agoThere’s a whole mueller report that was started and run by GOP. Person who started it was Rosenstein, a republican. Who picked Mueller another Republican. Why would they fake evidence against their own president?
- the_optimist 5y agoThis is idle speculation at best. It doesn’t attach to evidence, and it cannot be dispositive.
- adrr 5y agoMueller charged Russians for the hack.
- the_optimist 5y agoIndicted. Famously prosecutors can indict ham sandwiches. Conviction is different. No such thing here.
- adrr 5y agoHe convicted everyone that they could actually arrest.
- the_optimist 5y agoIf you twist it around enough, it sounds substantial. Then we have to slowly and tediously dig out that your end claim has utterly nothing to do with your beginning claim. Not the same countries, people, timelines, relationships, nothing.
- roenxi 5y agoAgain, "Muller has the evidence!" is pointing at someone and making a claim that never seems to have been backed up. It seems to be rather hard to actually cite this mountain of evidence without looking like a partisan hack.