3 ms·
Always because some of the people on my circles don't really care for the things I say work-related. But then I thought I'm only showing my work-related stuff t
by iaskwhy 15y ago
Always because some of the people on my circles don't really care for the things I say work-related. But then I thought I'm only showing my work-related stuff to a circle of coders and the whole world is missing it.
I believe I wanted Google+ to fix this problem for me, I was expecting a place where I could do my private life (with circles) and improve my professional life (public but without annoying some cirles of the private life).
In the end, I just feel lost not knowing how to use that pretty thing...
- dustingetz 15y agomy answer to this in the past has been: google identity = work (buzz, profile, gmail, twitter) facebook identity = social i think most people will continue to use existing social networks. we'll post appropriate content to our audience, and the audience at each network has a different tone. this is natural, i think.
- iaskwhy 15y agoI agree with you but I always thought circles would be amazing for my personal life since my work-related stuff should be public (at least most of it).
- simmons 15y agoI'm in the same boat. I post work stuff to my "Techno-Geeks" circle. Then when I look at the stream for this circle, I see all my geeky friends' cat pictures that they're posting to "Public" or their "Friends" circle. I'd love to have a group feature that works the way circles work, so I'd only see relevant posts when I go to the group-circle, and other people could post to it as well.
- piramida 15y agoG+ definitely needs a circle exclusion option. Then you could have public posts with several circles excluded (they can still read it since it's public but it won't pollute their stream unless they reply). But they will pick it up soon, no doubt. The need is there, technical possibilities are endless, so submit your feedback as I did and wait.