4 ms·
>Unlike a website, a car requires access to a physical, proprietary interface to embedded components. That's not necessarily true. For example, my car's ECU c
by owenmarshall 15y ago
>Unlike a website, a car requires access to a physical, proprietary interface to embedded components.
That's not necessarily true.
For example, my car's ECU can be reprogrammed using the instrumentation bus. The instrumentation bus can be accessed using the wires that interface with the CD changer. That means that the audio system is on the same network as the ECU -- and if I had a Bluetooth adapter, that'd likely be on the same network as well.
Indeed, researchers can disable electronically controlled brakes via Bluetooth:
http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/35094/?ref=rss&a=f http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/35094/?ref=rss&...
>Patches are impossible
I've had to take my car in for patches a few times. Where there is software, there will be patches required.
At the end of the day, I doubt we will be seeing assassinations via car hacking. But I wouldn't call it impossible.
- gcb 15y agoexactly. and even more worrisome, on-start shenanigans is tied to all kinds of sensors on your car. and it has a data connection. 24/7.
- trebor 15y agoI can't stand OnStar for those exact reasons, especially the GPS/data-connection.
- trebor 15y agoWhat I meant about it being impossible to patch the ECU was, if they used one of the single-write chips to store the firmware it couldn't be hacked/patched except by being replaced, or possibly manipulated from the inputs. > Indeed, researchers can disable electronically controlled brakes via Bluetooth That I didn't know. That's a major security problem, and another reason I'm glad for my 9 year old car.