3 ms·
> humanity developed in china is still popular Factually wrong statement 1. The claim was that Chinese were developed in the China land. Not humanity as a who
by justicezyx 5y ago
> humanity developed in china is still popular
Factually wrong statement
1. The claim was that Chinese were developed in the China land. Not humanity as a whole
2. People do not take such claim seriously.
Your statement appears that majority or at least large number of Chinese support this ridiculous claim.
- void_mint 5y ago> 2. People do not take such claim seriously. This reads "I don't, and I assume others don't, too", which, again, America has proven even the most ridiculous of ideas are believed by _some_, and oftentimes _lots_ of people.
- justicezyx 5y agoIsn't that need to considered in relative term? Some people showing certain behavior, when they are below certain percentage, just not going to affect the overall outlook of the nation. And we are talking about the national sentiment of China, comparably speaking, that applies to equally large scale sentiment in US. For example, there are a lot of people believe in flat earth theory, but that does not stand to be a US sentiment, one cannot claim that US people believe in flat earth. Same, one cannot claim Chinese people believe they are evolved from independent source than people living in other countries.
- void_mint 5y ago> For example, there are a lot of people believe in flat earth theory, but that does not stand to be a US sentiment, Nobody but you in this thread is speaking in absolutes. _Some_ to _lots of_ US citizens believe the earth is flat. > Same, one cannot claim Chinese people believe they are evolved from independent source than people living in other countries. _Some_ to _lots of_ Chinese people _do_ believe this. You keep saying "Nobody actually thinks ___", which isn't true.
- justicezyx 5y agoNever meant to say nobody actually think. I was saying it's ratio is very low. My English might not be precise.