3 ms·
> This laptop I'm typing from now was installed 2014-07-06, It goes beyond anecdotal evidence. I mean, if you look at the Arch news feed[0], there are a good f
by hjek 5y ago
> This laptop I'm typing from now was installed 2014-07-06,
It goes beyond anecdotal evidence. I mean, if you look at the Arch news feed[0], there are a good few updates since then that are labelled "requires manual intervention". I like Arch and it's great they're posting those notices, but I don't think it can be claimed that upgrading an on-the-edge system is always problem free.
[0] https://archlinux.org/news/ https://archlinux.org/news/
- spinax 5y agoThis is part of the agreement for using Arch, it's not a system you can ignore, you must actually pay attention to these news items. The upgrade tool I use actually shows new news to you front and center when performing an upgrade so you're blatantly aware that you have to follow instructions. Those are not "problems", they are "following instructions to keep up with changes." If you wand a distro to just ignore and hope it all goes well, Arch is not for you. Never was.
- seba_dos1 5y ago> there are a good few updates since then that are labelled "requires manual intervention" That's by design. If you choose Arch as your system, you're agreeing to that (otherwise why would you choose it in the first place - that's a direct consequence of its value proposition). I'm not sure I would call that a "problem".