4 ms·
Not convincing to me. Lots of mythical creatures share with same animal roots. That does not make them the same or equivalent.
by justicezyx 5y ago
Not convincing to me. Lots of mythical creatures share with same animal roots. That does not make them the same or equivalent.
- Bayart 5y agoWesterners naturally identified the Chinese 龍 with dragons, and so did the Chinese in reverse. The people that were directly involved found them equivalent, which is what matters. Keep in mind the « Westerners » were mostly Italian, not English, and that the Dragon in question was that of Saint George's iconography [1], a serpent with wings and quite often hair. [1] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vitale_da_bologna,_san_giorgio_libera_la_principessa,_1330-35_ca.,_01.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vitale_da_bologna,_s...
- justicezyx 5y agoSee, that's what serious discussion brings about. Now I am fully on board with the idea that dragon has a long cultural history and is appropriate to use on loong or 龙. The sad part is that the down voting is plainly distasteful. I hope people see the importance to maintain the right behavior pattern to enoucrage high quality discussion.
- powerapple 5y agoIt must be the first few explorers made the connection and everyone just followed. The same with many things named by Westerners. I found many things are not equivalent due to culture differences, but there is no way to translate if you don't approximate it to something in the other culture. I am just surprised that a correction has not been proposed by Chinese.