Exactly, you advocate "peer review" to censor scientific papers that don't agree with a pre-ordained political position. That's not science, and that's not obj

Exactly, you advocate "peer review" to censor scientific papers that don't agree with a pre-ordained political position. That's not science, and that's not objective. If you understood the issues, you'd understand that I disproved the AGW hypothesis in my earlier post. It really isn't that difficult. Obfuscation and complexity are the tools of politics, not science.