4 ms·
We wouldn't necessarily have to go back to that. We would be worse off without them [0], but Honda could get even GM's 5.7L V8 engine to pass regulations withou
by 29083011397778 5y ago
We wouldn't necessarily have to go back to that. We would be worse off without them [0], but Honda could get even GM's 5.7L V8 engine to pass regulations without a catalytic converter [1] in the mid-seventies. Eventually they couldn't get their CVCC engines to pass emissions without a cat, but we could make it back to the late seventies / early eighties. And that assumes we have made zero progress in engineering and material science over the last four decades, which strikes me as unlikely.
[0] https://www.designnews.com/stub/we-make-it-simple-how-honda-outsmarted-catalytic-converters https://www.designnews.com/stub/we-make-it-simple-how-honda-...
[1] https://jalopnik.com/when-honda-gave-gm-one-of-historys-most-amazing-smackdo-1576732771 https://jalopnik.com/when-honda-gave-gm-one-of-historys-most...
- cartoonworld 5y agoThat's really interesting, I was unaware of this CVCC technology. However, the first article mentions leaded gas as its upside, which is abhorrent, causing me to literally tremble in fear. I'll restrain myself from any analysis as I'm unfamiliar with this technology. Very interesting, thank you.