Not really what? The article you linked acknowledges the legal reasons that Huawei's employee share ownership was set up the way it was (limits on the number o

Not really what? The article you linked acknowledges the legal reasons that Huawei's employee share ownership was set up the way it was (limits on the number of individuals that private Chinese companies were legally allowed to distribute stares to). Most of the concerns the author has with Huawei are really just general concerns about any company in China - namely that the state theoretically could exert influence over them.