3 ms·
Yeah, this "RF energy" statement is too vague. Ok, you detected what exactly? At which frequencies? Power? BW? Does it look like something (unmodulated signal?
by raverbashing 5y ago
Yeah, this "RF energy" statement is too vague.
Ok, you detected what exactly? At which frequencies? Power? BW? Does it look like something (unmodulated signal? Modulated? How?)? Do you have a recording of it?
- guerrilla 5y agoConsidering that they were not directly in contact with the object, it is 100% necessarily true, so the statement is entirely meaningless without specifics like the ones you request.
- jablongo 5y agoThe RF emissions acknowledged here are something I'd never heard of before. Stating the obvious; even though this report is completely vague on that front (and all others), the fact that this was mentioned means that there was likely an RF abnormality in a few event reports. It's not really logical to assume they are talking about something trivial that a plastic bag would 'produce'. But yea - agreed, this is missing so much info.
- nosmokewhereiam 5y agoThink SIGINT, MASINT, and EW platforms. That's what RF means to me.