> Sounds like designating Antarctica be used exclusively for peaceful purposes is good stewardship like the Maori would do and not a land grab Ironically, the

> Sounds like designating Antarctica be used exclusively for peaceful purposes is good stewardship like the Maori would do and not a land grab Ironically, the Maori are famous for doing exactly the opposite, which confuses me about the whole premise of the article. Why don't we all just agree to the noble guidelines of the Antarctic Treaty without trying to justify them with some tortured scholarship?