> If the schools weren’t closed to protect the kids, then that seems to bolster the claim in the headline, “closing the world’s schools caused children great ha

> If the schools weren’t closed to protect the kids, then that seems to bolster the claim in the headline, “closing the world’s schools caused children great harm.” Absolutely, it did! But is that more harm than if their parents, siblings, grandparents, or friends got sick or died from covid? In short: Does that harm outweigh, balance, or is it overwhelmed by the harm caused but not closing schools? That's not an easy question. That being said, while I disagree with how the article's initial positioning on this topic (that governments didn't weigh the harms), I 100% agree with the rest of the article and I hope governments use this as an opportunity to improve education by learning from these experiences. > We closed the schools just fine but still had a real hard time getting universal mask wearing (for instance) to happen. Yet again, children suffer to pay for the selfish decisions of the adults. This is sounding suspiciously like a nirvana fallacy. All solutions for managing COVID are imperfect, and the defenses are layered. I struggle to believe there is any scenario where school closures are not a useful tool in the COVID prevention toolkit. Would it be nice if other measures were more effective and school closures could be used more sparingly? Sure. But we don't live in that world.