> I'm not sure how the article reaches the conclusion it does because [...] it's possible to eat nothing but Oreos and Kit-Kats [...] What conclusion do you th

> I'm not sure how the article reaches the conclusion it does because [...] it's possible to eat nothing but Oreos and Kit-Kats [...] What conclusion do you think it reaches that's incompatible with that? It looks to me as if the article says that Google's facilities encourage healthy eating, not that they force it. That's perfectly consistent with not making it impossible to subsist on Oreos and Kit-Kats if you're determined to do so.