4 ms·

Here is this person's commit history for the last year for additional context: https://public-001.gitsense.com/insights/github/repos?q=authors%3Athunder.leizhe

by sdesol 5y ago

Here is this person's commit history for the last year for additional context: https://public-001.gitsense.com/insights/github/repos?q=authors%3Athunder.leizhen%40huawei.com%2Bwindow%3A365&r=github%3Atorvalds%2Flinux&v=repo https://public-001.gitsense.com/insights/github/repos?q=auth... They do appear to contribute regularly enough (relatively speaking) and based on some of the busfactor metrics, they are the sole maintainer or main maintainers for about 50 files. And if you look at their one line change commits, they do seem to be valid: https://public-001.gitsense.com/insights/github/repos?p=commits&q=authors%3Athunder.leizhen%40huawei.com%2Bcommit-churn%3A1%2Bfile-churn%3A1%2Bwindow%3A365&r=github%3Atorvalds%2Flinux&v=repo https://public-001.gitsense.com/insights/github/repos?p=comm... Disclaimer: I'm the creator of the tool for the links above

delroth 5y ago
> And if you look at their one line change commits, they do seem to be valid By construction, yes. You're only looking at their commits that were merged into Linus's tree.
- sdesol 5y ago
  Yes you are right. I was more establishing this person's successful contributions and that they appear to provide meaningful contributions. What is happening now with all the new proposed changes that is causing a stir is something that I really can't speak too since there is no easy way to navigate their proposed changes.