> I am 100% on your team here, but I do want to point out that what is important to developers is rarely considered important by the business, more that it's a

> I am 100% on your team here, but I do want to point out that what is important to developers is rarely considered important by the business, more that it's a cost of working with developers. Well, IMO constant churn of developers who change jobs every 2 years is very adversely impacting quality of the product. When people know and expect they are most likely to be leaving in 2-3 years tops they are not going to stand for what they believe and will be much more amenable to pressure and taking on debt that somebody else is going to be paying. Now, churn can be easily measured, but its impact on the product or how developer satisfaction contributes to it cannot be easily linked.