2 ms·
I prefer a strong-typed, compiled language for an internet exposed service any day over a dyn typed, interpreted language. See how many remote exploits are due
by cies 5y ago
I prefer a strong-typed, compiled language for an internet exposed service any day over a dyn typed, interpreted language.
See how many remote exploits are due to languages allowing "eval(..)" or allowing disk access.
Also: Postgres is in C mostly, not a very hackable language, though no-body complains because it is infra. To me Hasura is the same: infra.
The code I write on top of PG/Hasura is in Elm and runs directly in the browser (as transpiled JS).