One might be so inclined to label Google a peddler of fabricated misinformation... I seriously can't believe that the sources of the image and text aren't labe

One might be so inclined to label Google a peddler of fabricated misinformation... I seriously can't believe that the sources of the image and text aren't labeled with their respective sources. Doing so seems basic, obvious and trivial. Not doing so seems to be a blatant attempt to hide expected inaccuracies and make meaningless combinations of information seem more authoritative than it actually is. While I think this individual would have a hard time in any court system, let alone the US court system, could Wikipedia perhaps have a claim of damages for libel (or something to this effect) due to misattributed information and reputational damage?