4 ms·
The argument was that Facebook is so big that they’re a danger. Limiting their speech is not compatible with US law, as you mention. So the proper solution is
by cvwright 5y ago
The argument was that Facebook is so big that they’re a danger. Limiting their speech is not compatible with US law, as you mention.
So the proper solution is not to limit what they can say. It’s to stop them being so big that they are a danger.
- Dracophoenix 5y agoWho gets to decide what's "dangerous" and on what terms? What if I disagree with that assessment? What does my view count for?