I'm pretty open to the ethical version of this article omitting Thiel's name. I also think it would be interesting to talk about what it is in this reporting t

I'm pretty open to the ethical version of this article omitting Thiel's name. I also think it would be interesting to talk about what it is in this reporting that materially harms Thiel. That he is a billionaire and that he owns PayPal stock was previously public knowledge. This only seems to introduce information about how much tax his Roth is sheltering him from - which the anonymous version of the article would also cover.