3 ms·

Everybody knows that when presented with the irrefutable evidence that the Challenger o-rings would fail, they more or less just let the astronauts die. Definit

Everybody knows that when presented with the irrefutable evidence that the Challenger o-rings would fail, they more or less just let the astronauts die. Definitely cut from same cloth as any other org.

bumby 5y ago
That’s not quite accurate. It wasn’t that there was “irrefutable” evidence that the o-rings would fail, it was there wasn’t data that they would, or wouldn’t, fail. “The O-rings were never tested in extreme cold.”[1] There wasn’t data which led to discussions about uncertainty, but that shouldn’t be conflated with irrefutable evidence of failure. The obviousness of it (like many engineering failures) was only apparent in hindsight. “Evidence, in retrospect, points to a long period of time, especially based on post-flight inspections when the joint design weakness was ‘sending a message’ and the true potential of this message was not perceived and reacted to.”[2] “Not perceived” isn’t compatible with “irrefutable evidence that it would fail”. [1] https://www.space.com/31732-space-shuttle-challenger-disaster-explained-infographic.html https://www.space.com/31732-space-shuttle-challenger-disaste... [2]https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRPT-99hrpt1016/pdf/GPO-CRPT-99hrpt1016.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRPT-99hrpt1016/pdf/...