4 ms·
I can see why one would be concerned about a heavily centralized DNS, but what I've experienced in the real world is that today's DNS gives me infinitely more o
by djrogers 5y ago
I can see why one would be concerned about a heavily centralized DNS, but what I've experienced in the real world is that today's DNS gives me infinitely more options than I had back when I started on the Internet.
Back in the day, you were often limited to one or two widely known public servers (MCI's for example) or your ISPs. Today I have tons of providers of public DNS, all with different advantages and tradeoffs, including paid features and support. This alone is radically better than the choices we had ~20 years ago.
Add to that the fact that I can run my own caching resolver without reading a 642 page paper bound book (see pihole vs a dog-eared copy of DNS and BIND by Liu and and Albitz), and we're far from the dystopian nightmare you seem to be referring to.
- jsjohnst 5y ago> you were often limited to one or two widely known public servers I have a found memory for the days when you could still use ns.sun.com (192.9.9.3) as a recursive resolver as it was such an easy to remember IP (for those days anyway).
- Dah00n 5y agoUnless he edited his comment it said nothing of the sort. It states there's a push and there is.