3 ms·
I really doubt that. If we focus in particular on bike theft (one of the examples above), some webpage says that Norway had 60k bike thefts in 2004, 20k of whic
by vilhelm_s 5y ago
I really doubt that. If we focus in particular on bike theft (one of the examples above), some webpage says that Norway had 60k bike thefts in 2004, 20k of which was reported to the police[1]. This is out of a population of 4.5 million. Some other page says that in New York City, there are 75k bikes stolen per year with 15k reported to the police[2]. This is out of a population of 8.4 million.
So all of Norway (rural and urban areas together) had a higher per-capita rate of bike theft than New York City (which is all urban).
[1] http://www.sykkeltyveri.no/bicycle_theft.html http://www.sykkeltyveri.no/bicycle_theft.html
[2] https://www.bicyclehabitat.com/articles/security-pg80.htm https://www.bicyclehabitat.com/articles/security-pg80.htm
- juanani 5y agoAren't you forgetting to include the percentage of population that owns/uses a bike? Hey but links to statistics are cool, makes you sound super smart dunnit?
- jnsaff2 5y agoNow to make things interesting, want to adjust this for per capita bike ownership or usage? Otherwise this is could just be picking places favorable to the point you want to make?
- _huayra_ 5y agoYeah I think this is indeed skewed. Per capita bike theft is gonna be higher if those "capita" own more bikes!