3 ms·
I mean it makes sense. The main stream media found they their viewership increased with explosive, inflammatory, polarizing, world-ending stories, so news repor
by rytcio 5y ago
I mean it makes sense. The main stream media found they their viewership increased with explosive, inflammatory, polarizing, world-ending stories, so news reports are nothing but that. Twitter/Facebook learned that too, so they promote outrage culture so that people use their product. I remember back in the late 2000s, Twitter had a hard time keeping people engaged and getting new users. Who cares about what someone ate for lunch or what new latte they ordered? Then the Obama election happened and the Kony2012 meme. They got their dopamine hit and have kept it going.
- sneak 5y agoNot everything that is plausible is true.
- DSingularity 5y agoDo you have an alternative explanation?
- sneak 5y agoYes, several. They all seem plausible as well, which doesn't tell me anything about any of them being true or not. 1. The US mass media's race to the bottom as previous/traditional revenue models and funding mechanisms fall away 2. Rising economic hardship and income inequality causing greater widespread dissatisfaction with the status quo 3. App-based "free" social media in general where engagement time is prioritized above all else (Facebook didn't invent this) 4. The growing influence of big tech and financialization (SV and Wall Street) and the waning influence of the american worker 5. Demagogues 6. The death throes of the US political parties as they thrash about in a desperate push to try to stay relevant, resorting to simple and effective scapegoating and tribalism I'm sure you can probably toss out a few more plausible ones, too.