You made an implicit argument that regulation doesn't work, I simply pointed out that it does in many many place. You now argue that it doesn't work because th

You made an implicit argument that regulation doesn't work, I simply pointed out that it does in many many place. You now argue that it doesn't work because the item being regulated is in wide spread possession. Drones are not. Thus by your own chain of reasoning it is perfectly reasonable to enforce very strong regulations NOW if we wish to have any chance of managing drones. I guess, thank you for making such a great argument for strong regulation from the onset.